When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

5 Best VPNs Outside 5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, and 14 Eyes Countries in 2026

Last updated July 17, 2026
Written by:
Novak Bozovic
Novak Bozovic
Tech & VPN Content Specialist
Edited by:
Rachita Jain
Rachita Jain
VPN Staff Editor
Why You Can Trust TechNadu
13
Test Process
53
VPNs Reviewed
100%
Transparency

Our experts have reviewed 53 VPN providers, which were put through extensive rounds of testing. To learn more about that process, here’s how we review VPNs, where we explain our criteria and our policy of being fully transparent.

Quick Answer
  • If you’re looking for the best VPN outside 14 Eyes, our analysis of 44 VPNs ranks NordVPN #1 with a score of 97/100, followed by Proton VPN (96/100) and ExpressVPN (90/100). NordVPN leads with a Panama jurisdiction, multiple independent no-logs audits by PwC and Deloitte, RAM-only servers, transparent ownership, and no confirmed data-sharing incidents. Proton VPN scores highly for its Swiss jurisdiction, strong transparency, and consistent audits, while ExpressVPN stands out with multiple independent audits, RAM-only TrustedServer technology, and a clean privacy record.

The 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance is a group of countries that share intelligence and surveillance data with one another. If a VPN is based in one of these countries, it may be legally compelled to hand over whatever user data it has.

That's why we focused on VPNs based outside the 14 Eyes alliance. However, jurisdiction alone isn't enough to determine whether a VPN deserves your trust. We also evaluated each provider's independent no-logs audits, ownership transparency, privacy history, and transparency reporting. Every VPN first had to pass our Eligibility Check before being scored using our weighted 100-point methodology.

In this guide, you'll find the highest-scoring VPNs outside the 14 Eyes alliance based on our evaluation, learn how we ranked them, understand what each score means, and see how to use our VPN comparison sheet to evaluate your current VPN or compare other providers using the same criteria.

Recent Updates

July 15, 2026: Added a quick answer section highlighting the top VPN picks and scores. Updated the ranking methodology, expanded the scoring breakdown, refreshed VPN audit details, added Bitdefender VPN to the top recommendations, and improved provider comparisons with ownership, transparency, and incident history analysis.
November 28, 2025: Expanded the VPN transparency tracker from a basic comparison sheet into a detailed privacy evaluation framework covering jurisdiction, 5/9/14 Eyes membership, parent company ownership, independent no-logs audits, auditors, and confirmed data-sharing incidents.

How We Rank VPNs Outside the 14 Eyes Alliance

We wanted to find VPNs that are truly based outside the 5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, and 14 Eyes intelligence-sharing alliances. To do this, we used a two-step process.

First, each VPN had to meet our basic requirements. Only VPNs that passed these checks moved on to scoring. We based our research on public company records, independent audit reports, and verified information about each provider's history. We did not rely on marketing claims made by the VPN companies themselves.

Test Environment:Device: Lenovo ThinkPadOS: Windows 11 ProCountry: IndiaDate: July 11 - 14, 2026Tested by: Rachita JainData Source: TechNadu VPN Jurisdiction, Ownership & Logging Evidence Sheet (44 VPN providers)

Step 1: Eligibility Check: Before we scored any VPN, it had to pass all three of these checks:
- It must be legally based outside the 5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, and 14 Eyes alliances.
- It must have no confirmed history of sharing user data with authorities.
- It must have completed at least one independent no-logs audit, or have at least three years with no confirmed privacy incidents.
If a VPN failed even one of these checks, it was removed from our main rankings. No amount of strong performance in other areas could make up for failing these basic requirements.

Step 2: Scoring: VPNs that passed the eligibility check were scored in four areas.
1. Audit Strength (40%): Independent audits help verify that a VPN follows its no-logs policy. We looked at:
- How many independent no-logs audits the VPN has completed
- How recent the latest audit is
- Whether the audit was carried out by a well-known independent firm
- Whether the audit report is publicly available
2. Incident-Free Track Record (30%): We reviewed each provider's history to see if it had ever been involved in a confirmed or credible data-sharing incident. We also considered how long ago it happened and whether the company addressed the issue.
3. Ownership Transparency (15%): We looked at how open each VPN is about who owns and operates the company. We also noted if multiple VPNs in our rankings are owned by the same parent company.
4. Transparency Reporting (15%): We checked whether the VPN regularly publishes transparency reports or maintains a warrant canary. We also considered how recently this information was updated.

Test Area Weight Meets Criteria Partially Meets Does Not Meet
Eligibility Check Pass/Fail Passes all three requirements Not applicable Fails any requirement and is excluded
Audit Strength 40% Four or more independent audits, latest within the past 12 months, reputable auditor, public report One to three audits, latest within the past 24 months No independent audit or report not publicly available
Incident-Free Track Record 30% No confirmed or credible data-sharing incidents Confirmed incident more than five years ago that was fully resolved Confirmed incident within the past two to five years
Ownership Transparency 15% Clear ownership with no overlap with other ranked VPNs Ownership disclosed but shared with another ranked VPN Ownership not disclosed or cannot be verified
Transparency Reporting 15% Regular transparency reports or warrant canary updated within the past 12 months Reports exist but are outdated or published irregularly No transparency report or warrant canary

Our ranking is based on the data collected in our VPN Jurisdiction, Ownership & Logging Evidence Sheet, which tracks key privacy factors across VPN providers, including jurisdiction, 5/9/14 Eyes alliance status, ownership structure, independent no-logs audits, transparency records, and confirmed privacy incidents. We used this sheet as the foundation for our evaluation and scoring process. To help readers better understand how we built this resource, why we selected these criteria, and how to interpret the information, we have provided additional details below:

These resources explain the methodology behind our data collection and how you can use the same framework to evaluate VPN providers beyond marketing claims.

Best VPNs Outside 14 Eyes Alliance - Based on Our Sheet

When people ask "what's the best VPN outside 14 eyes alliance," the answer is NordVPN, Proton VPN, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost VPN, and Bitdefender VPN.

These providers were selected based on strict measurable criteria from our scoring model:

We did not select these VPNs because of popularity, advertising, affiliate partnerships, or external rankings. They appear here because they scored highest when evaluated using the same criteria applied across all providers in our database.

Some VPNs may have strong features or large user bases but rank lower because of weaker audit history, less transparency, or past privacy concerns. This section only reflects performance based on the scoring sheet.

Let's have a look at the top 5 picks:

  1. NordVPN – Founded in 2012 and based in Panama (outside 14 Eyes) • Has 6 independent no-logs audits (2018, 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025) by PwC Switzerland and Deloitte Audit LithuaniaOwned by Nord Security (merged with Surfshark in 2022)No confirmed data sharing.
  2. ProtonVPN Founded in 2017 and based in Switzerland (outside 14 Eyes)Has 5 independent no-logs audits (2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026) by SecuritumOwned by Proton AGNo confirmed data sharing.
  3. ExpressVPN Founded in 2009 and based in the British Virgin Islands (outside 14 Eyes)Has 3 independent no-logs audits (2019, 2022, 2025) by PwC and KPMG LLPOwned by Kape Technologies (acquired 2021)No confirmed data sharing.
  4. Cyberghost Founded in 2011 and based in Romania (outside 14 Eyes)Has 2 independent no-logs audits (2022, 2024) by DeloitteOwned by Kape TechnologiesNo confirmed data sharing.
  5. Bitdefender Founded in 2017 and based in Romania (outside 14 Eyes) • Has 2 independent audits • Owned by Bitdefender SRL • No confirmed data sharing
VPN Provider Eligibility Check Score (out of 100) Why This Score Year Founded Country of Incorporation Member of 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance Parent Company Independent No-Logs Audit Report Auditor(s) Confirmed Data Sharing? Incident Proof
NordVPN ✅ Pass 97 Outside the intelligence-sharing alliances, six independent no-logs audits by reputable firms, and no confirmed data-sharing incidents. 2012 Panama No Nord Security (merged with Surfshark 2022) Yes - 6 Audits (2018, 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025) PwC Switzerland; Deloitte Audit Lithuania No
Proton VPN ✅ Pass 96 Scored highly thanks to five consecutive independent audits, a spotless privacy record, fully transparent ownership under Proton AG and the Proton Foundation, and industry-leading transparency reports and warrant canaries. Slightly fewer audits than NordVPN prevented a perfect audit score. 2017 Switzerland No Proton AG Yes - 5 Audits (2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026) Securitum No
ExpressVPN ✅ Pass 90 Strong independent verification through multiple PwC and KPMG audits, a clean privacy history, and RAM-only server infrastructure. Points were deducted for fewer audits than NordVPN and Proton VPN, ownership under Kape Technologies, and comparatively less comprehensive transparency reporting.  2009 British Virgin Islands No Kape Technologies (acquired 2021) Yes - 3 Audits (2019, 2022, 2025) PwC; KPMG LLP No
CyberGhost VPN ✅ Pass 85 Achieved a strong score with two Deloitte no-logs audits, no confirmed privacy incidents, excellent quarterly transparency reports, and transparent ownership. Lost points because its audit history is less extensive than the top-ranked providers and it shares ownership with other VPN brands under Kape Technologies.  2011 Romania No Kape Technologies Yes - 2 Audits (2022, 2024) Deloitte No
Bitdefender VPN ✅ Pass 80 Received credit for two recent independent audits, transparent ownership, and an incident-free privacy history. Its score was reduced because the auditing firm has not been publicly disclosed and the company provides limited transparency reporting compared with higher-ranked competitors 2017 (approx.) Romania No Bitdefender SRL Yes - 2 Audit (2023, 2025) Not publicly specified No
Hide.me ✅ Pass 77 Passed all eligibility checks with a recent independent audit by Securitum and DefenseCode, no confirmed privacy incidents, independently owned operations, and a privacy-friendly Malaysian jurisdiction. Lost points due to having only one audit and limited transparency reporting compared with leading providers.  2012 Malaysia No eVenture Ltd. Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Leon Juranić (DefenseCode); Securitum No
FastestVPN ✅ Pass 75 Qualified through its independent Cure53 audit, independently owned business, and long-standing clean privacy record. Its score reflects excellent ownership transparency but is reduced because its latest audit is several years old and it publishes fewer transparency updates than higher-ranked providers.  2016 Cayman Islands No Fast Technology Ltd. Yes - 1 Audit (2023) Altius IT No
IVPN ✅ Pass 72 Earned its place by passing all eligibility checks, including an independent no-logs audit and no confirmed privacy incidents. Its overall score is lower due to a shorter audit history, fewer publicly available transparency reports, and a less established privacy verification record than the providers ranked above it.  2009 Gibraltar No IVPN Limited (Privatus Ltd.) Yes - 1 Audit (2019) Cure53 No
Surfshark VPN ❌ Fail 2018 Netherlands Yes (9 Eyes) Nord Security (merged 2022) Yes - 2 Audits (2023, 2025) Deloitte No
PIA (Private Internet Access) ❌ Fail 2010 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Kape Technologies Yes - 2 Audits (2022, 2024) Deloitte Audit Romania No
Norton Secure VPN ❌ Fail 2017 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Gen Digital (NortonLifeLock) Yes - 2 Audit (2024, 2025) VerSprite No
Opera VPN ❌ Fail 2022 Norway Yes (9 Eyes) Opera Software AS Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Deloitte No
Brave VPN ❌ Fail 2020 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Brave Software, Inc. Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Assured AB (Swedish security firm) No
Mullvad VPN ❌ Fail 2009 Sweden Yes (14 Eyes) Amagicom AB (Mullvad VPN AB) Yes - 1 Audit (2022) Assured AB (Swedish security firm) No
VyprVPN ❌ Fail 2009 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Certida LLC Yes - 1 Audit (2018) Leviathan Security Group No
Ivacy VPN ❌ Fail 2007 Singapore No PMG Pte. Ltd. No No
Whoer VPN (WhoX) ❌ Fail 2022 Cyprus No WHOIX Ltd. No No
CactusVPN ❌ Fail 2011 Moldova No CactusVPN Ltd. No No
Trust.Zone ❌ Fail 2014 Seychelles No Trusted Solutions LLC No No
Avast SecureLine VPN ❌ Fail 2014 Czech Republic No Gen Digital (formerly Avast) No No
Mysterium VPN ❌ Fail 2017 Switzerland No Mysterium Network (Mysterium AG) No No
iTop VPN ❌ Fail 2020 Hong Kong No iTop Inc. No No
PrivadoVPN ❌ Fail 2019 Switzerland No Privado Networks AG No No
Kaspersky VPN ❌ Fail 2017 Russia No Kaspersky Lab No No
Astrill VPN ❌ Fail 2009 Liechtenstein No Astrill – privately owned, Liechtenstein-incorporated No No
TorGuard VPN ❌ Fail 2012 United States No VPNetworks LLC No No
Perfect Privacy ❌ Fail 2008 Switzerland No CyberDock IT Solutions GmbH No No
PrivateVPN ❌ Fail 2009 Sweden Yes (14 Eyes) Miss Group (acquired 2022) No No
AirVPN ❌ Fail 2010 Italy Yes (14 Eyes) AirVPN di Paolo Brini No No
Fast VPN (Namecheap) ❌ Fail 2021 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Namecheap, Inc. No No
VPN Unlimited (KeepSolid) ❌ Fail 2013 United States Yes (5 Eyes) KeepSolid Inc. No No
McAfee Safe Connect VPN ❌ Fail 2017 United States Yes (5 Eyes) McAfee Corp. No No
StrongVPN ❌ Fail 2005 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Ziff Davis (J2 Global – acquired 2019) No No
Mozilla VPN ❌ Fail 2020 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Mozilla Corporation (Mozilla Foundation) No No
Windscribe VPN ❌ Fail 2016 Canada Yes (5 Eyes) Windscribe Limited Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Packetlabs Ltd Partial 2021
PureVPN ❌ Fail 2007 Hong Kong No GZ Systems Ltd. (PureSquare) Yes - 4 Audits (2019, 2020, 2021, 2023) Altius IT, KPMG Yes 2017
IPVanish ❌ Fail 2012 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Ziff Davis (J2 Global – acquired 2019) Yes - 2 Audits (2022, 2025) Leviathan Security Group, Schellman Yes 2016
Hotspot Shield VPN ❌ Fail 2008 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Aura (acquired via Pango in 2020) Yes - 1 Audit (2023) Aon (Cyber Solutions) Yes 2017
HideMyAss (HMA) ❌ Fail 2005 United Kingdom Yes (5 Eyes) Gen Digital (formerly Avast/Norton) Yes - 1 Audit (2020) VerSprite (cybersecurity consulting) Yes 2011
Hola VPN ❌ Fail 2012 Israel No Hola Networks Ltd. No Yes 2015
Urban VPN ❌ Fail 2018 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Urban Cyber Security Inc. No Yes 2024
VPN Super Unlimited Proxy ❌ Fail 2022 Singapore Yes (5 Eyes) Super Unlimited Inc. No Yes 2019
Touch VPN ❌ Fail 2014 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Aura (acquired via AnchorFree/Pango) No Yes
Turbo VPN ❌ Fail 2018 Singapore No Innovative Connecting Pte. Ltd. No Yes (suspected) 2023

1. NordVPN

Editor's Pick
Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chromebook
Kindle
Chrome
Firefox
PlayStation
Apple TV
Xbox
Amazon Fire TV
Nintendo Switch
All game consoles
Chromecast
Parallel Connections
Live Chat
Score Why this score?
Audit Strength 40/40 Full score because NordVPN has the strongest audit history in our evaluation: six independent no-logs audits conducted by two globally recognized audit firms (PwC and Deloitte) over multiple years.
Incident-Free Record 30/30 No confirmed logging or data-sharing incidents. Although a third-party data center was compromised in 2019, no user activity logs were exposed due to NordVPN's no-logs architecture.
Ownership Transparency 14/15 Nord Security ownership is publicly disclosed with a well-known corporate structure. One point is deducted because Proton provides slightly greater ownership transparency through its nonprofit governance model.
Transparency Reporting 13/15 Publishes audit summaries and privacy documentation but offers less extensive transparency reporting than Proton VPN and CyberGhost.
Total Score 97/100 Highest audit verification and one of the strongest overall privacy foundations among all providers evaluated.

NordVPN remains one of the strongest privacy-focused VPN providers based on our scoring sheet, earning 97/100 due to its extensive independent audit history, clean incident record, transparent ownership structure, and privacy-friendly jurisdiction.

To explore its features, pricing, and more, visit our detailed NordVPN review page.

PROS

  • Based in Panama, outside 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
  • Six independent no-logs audits confirming privacy.
  • Transparent, privacy-focused ownership by Nord Security.
  • Uses RAM-only servers to wipe data on reboot.
  • Large privacy-focused ecosystem with Nord Security also owning Surfshark and Atlas VPN.

CONS

  • Transparency reporting is strong but less extensive than some competitors.
  • Parent company Nord Security owns multiple VPN brands, which may concern users preferring standalone providers.

2. ProtonVPN

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chromebook
Parallel Connections
Live Chat
Score Why this score?
Audit Strength 36/40 Three points deducted because Proton has five audits instead of six, all audits were conducted by Securitum, and it lacks the auditor diversity demonstrated by NordVPN and ExpressVPN.
Incident-Free Record 30/30 No confirmed logging or data-sharing incidents.
Ownership Transparency 15/15 Full score because Proton AG ownership is fully disclosed, and the Proton Foundation provides one of the industry's clearest governance structures.
Transparency Reporting 15/15 Full score for comprehensive transparency reports, warrant canary updates, public privacy documentation, and strong communication practices.
Total Score 96/100 Outstanding transparency and governance, supported by a consistently audited and incident-free privacy infrastructure.

Proton VPN is one of the strongest privacy-focused VPN providers in our ranking, scoring 96/100 on our evaluation sheet. While it ranks second in our final ordering due to our weighting methodology, it achieves the highest overall numerical score because of its exceptional transparency, clearly disclosed ownership, strong privacy jurisdiction, and consistent independent audit history.

ProtonVPN’s legal foundation and audit track record make it a solid choice for privacy-conscious users. For more about its features and pricing, check out our in-depth Proton VPN review.

PROS

  • Based in Switzerland, outside 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
  • Five consecutive independent no-logs audits by Securitum.
  • No confirmed data-sharing incidents.
  • Strong transparency reports and warrant canary system.
  • Clear ownership through Proton AG and Proton Foundation.
  • Open-source apps increase public verifiability.

CONS

  • Does not use RAM-only servers.
  • Switzerland can still respond to valid legal requests under its own legal framework.
  • Some rented servers rely on full-disk encryption rather than owned infrastructure.

3. ExpressVPN

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chromebook
Kindle
Nook
Chrome
Firefox
PlayStation
Apple TV
Xbox
Amazon Fire TV
Nintendo Switch
All game consoles
All smart TVs
Chromecast
Roku
Parallel Connections
Live Chat
Score Why this score?
Audit Strength 38/40 Two points deducted because ExpressVPN has fewer total audits than NordVPN, although it benefits from reviews by multiple respected firms including PwC, KPMG, and Cure53.
Incident-Free Record 30/30 No confirmed logging or data-sharing incidents.
Ownership Transparency 13/15 Two points deducted because, while Kape Technologies ownership is publicly disclosed, it provides slightly less ownership transparency than Proton and Nord.
Transparency Reporting 09/15 One point deducted because ExpressVPN publishes regular security documentation but less extensive transparency reporting than Proton VPN.
Total Score 90/100 Strong multi-auditor verification, RAM-only infrastructure, and a long-standing clean privacy record.

ExpressVPN has long been one of the most recognized privacy-focused VPN providers, and its strong position comes from a combination of extensive independent audits, a clean privacy record, and mature security infrastructure. With multiple independent assessments from respected auditors, ExpressVPN remains one of the strongest performers in our ranking, scoring 90/100.

Let's learn more about its capabilities and pricing in our comprehensive and in-depth review of ExpressVPN.

PROS

  • Based in the British Virgin Islands, outside the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
  • Multiple independent audits from PwC, KPMG, and Cure53.
  • No confirmed data-sharing incidents.
  • Uses RAM-only TrustedServer infrastructure.
  • Maintains independent operations despite Kape Technologies ownership.

CONS

  • BVI autonomy may raise concerns for some due to UK ties.
  • Ownership under Kape Technologies may concern some privacy-focused users.
  • Parent company owns multiple VPN brands, including CyberGhost, PIA, and ZenMate.

4. CyberGhost

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chrome
Firefox
PlayStation
Xbox
Amazon Fire TV
Nintendo Switch
Samsung Smart TV
All game consoles
All smart TVs
Roku
Parallel Connections
Live Chat
Score Why this score?
Audit Strength 28/40 Eight points deducted because CyberGhost has fewer publicly documented audits than the top three providers and relies primarily on a single auditing firm (Deloitte). Also, there is no recent one.
Incident-Free Record 30/30 No confirmed logging or data-sharing incidents.
Ownership Transparency 12/15 Three points deducted because, although Kape Technologies ownership is disclosed, CyberGhost provides less public information about corporate governance and operational independence than ExpressVPN or Proton.
Transparency Reporting 15/15 Full score because CyberGhost publishes regular quarterly transparency reports and provides detailed privacy disclosures.
Total Score 85/100 Excellent transparency reporting and clean privacy history, though its audit history is less extensive than the leading providers.

CyberGhost VPN is a privacy-focused VPN provider that combines a large global server network, strong transparency practices, and a clean privacy record. Based on our updated ranking sheet, CyberGhost scores 85/100, placing it among the strongest VPN providers outside the major intelligence-sharing alliances.

While CyberGhost has fewer independent audits compared with the top-ranked providers, its strong transparency reporting and incident-free history help strengthen its overall privacy position.

For an extensive look at how CyberGhost performs and its pricing plans, visit our CyberGhost review page where we talk aout each and every aspect related to CyberGhost.

PROS

  • Based in Romania, outside the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
  • Multiple Deloitte audits verify no-logs claims.
  • No confirmed data-sharing incidents.
  • Strong transparency reporting history.
  • Uses RAM-based server infrastructure.

CONS

  • Romania’s EU jurisdiction has some surveillance cooperation.
  • Parent company Kape Technologies owns multiple VPN brands, reducing standalone ownership appeal.

5. Bitdefender VPN

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Parallel Connections
Rating
Score Why this score?
Audit Strength 28/40 Twelve points deducted because Bitdefender VPN has only limited publicly available independent audit verification compared with leading providers. While it benefits from being backed by a reputable cybersecurity company, its audit history is shorter and less extensive than NordVPN, Proton VPN, and ExpressVPN.
Incident-Free Record 30/30 Full score because there are no confirmed logging, data-sharing, or privacy incidents associated with Bitdefender VPN.
Ownership Transparency 14/15 One point deducted because Bitdefender SRL ownership is clearly disclosed and backed by an established security company, but its VPN-specific ownership and governance transparency are less detailed than Proton VPN.
Transparency Reporting 8/15 Seven points deducted because Bitdefender provides privacy documentation but does not publish transparency reports, warrant canary information, or the same level of public privacy disclosures as providers like Proton VPN and CyberGhost.
Total Score 80/100 Bitdefender VPN benefits from a strong cybersecurity foundation and clean privacy record, but lower public audit visibility and limited transparency reporting reduce its overall privacy ranking.

Bitdefender VPN is a privacy-focused VPN backed by one of the world's leading cybersecurity companies, earning 80/100 in our scoring system thanks to its privacy-friendly Romanian jurisdiction, transparent ownership, independent no-logs audits, and clean public privacy record. While its audit history is not as extensive as the industry's top providers, it demonstrates a growing commitment to transparency through regular third-party verification.

To explore its features, pricing, and more, visit our detailed Bitdefender VPN review page.

PROS

  • Based in Romania, outside the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
  • Two independent no-logs audits (2023 and 2025).
  • Transparent ownership by Bitdefender SRL.
  • No publicly confirmed privacy or data-sharing incidents.

CONS

  • Auditing firm for 2025 audit has not been publicly disclosed.
  • Does not publicly advertise a RAM-only server network.

VPNs That Have Shared Data With Governments

While many VPNs promise strong privacy protections, a few have confirmed instances of sharing user data with governments or law enforcement agencies. Some of these VPNs tick most boxes, but leave one or two. We have mentioned one such VPN that looks perfect, but only because of its cover:

PureVPN

Other VPNs Confirmed to Have Shared Data:

From all this data, one thing is clear - you should weigh such incidents heavily when choosing a VPN, as trust and privacy can be compromised even by providers claiming no-logs policies. It is best to rely on VPNs with transparent independent audits, strong no-logs enforcement, company backgrounds and jurisdictions with robust privacy laws. You cannot just look at one thing and forget the rest. The entire picture is very important.

Understanding the 5, 9, and 14 Eyes Alliances – What You Need to Know

The 5, 9, and 14 Eyes are closely related intelligence-sharing alliances. They started as secret partnerships during and after World War II and evolved over decades into powerful global surveillance networks. Each alliance groups a set of countries that legally agree to collect, share, and exchange signals intelligence (SIGINT) and communications data, often bypassing individual privacy protections by outsourcing surveillance to partner countries.

Here’s what makes each alliance unique, along with their privacy downfalls:

Alliance Member Countries What It Means Downfalls
5 Eyes United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand The core intelligence-sharing group, with wide-ranging, unrestricted access to signals intelligence, including bulk collection systems like ECHELON and PRISM. - Most powerful surveillance network globally
- Mass data collection including foreign and domestic surveillance
- VPNs based here can be forced to hand over user data
- Data or intelligence is shared freely between all five nations
9 Eyes 5 Eyes countries plus France, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway An extension of the 5 Eyes with four additional nations that contribute intelligence, but with limited access compared to the core five. - Additional surveillance reach into parts of Europe
- Participating countries share intelligence but with less direct access than 5 Eyes
- VPNs in these countries may still face legal demands to share user data
14 Eyes 9 Eyes countries plus Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden A broader collaboration adding five more countries with limited intelligence access but generally cooperating on counterterrorism and cybersecurity. - Further expansion of surveillance territory
- Collaboration expands potential data-sharing and retention obligations
- Legal frameworks and cooperation in the EU increase user privacy risks
- VPNs headquartered here face similar concerns as above alliances

Think of the 5, 9, and 14 Eyes not as completely separate entities, but as layers in a growing surveillance network. Each time more countries join (from 5 to 9 to 14), the scope of intelligence sharing and cooperation widens.

This means if your VPN is based in a 14 Eyes country, it’s potentially subject to all the surveillance laws and agreements in the 5 Eyes and 9 Eyes countries too, since these alliances regularly exchange data with each other. So, your data could be exposed in multiple jurisdictions, even if your VPN tries to promise privacy.

That’s why, in our VPN sheet, we not only mark alliance membership but also include details like independent no-logs audits and parent company ownership. These elements help you judge whether a VPN based in an Eyes country still offers strong privacy protections, or whether you should look elsewhere.

Bottom line? The 5, 9, and 14 Eyes alliances form a growing global surveillance network. More countries mean more places where your online activity could be monitored or data collected. If your VPN is based in one of these countries, your privacy may be at risk despite promises. That’s why our sheet also checks independent no-logs audits and parent company ownership, so you can see which VPNs truly protect your privacy and which ones might not. This helps you make an informed choice instead of relying on marketing claims.

No-Logs VPNs in Eyes Countries: Why Audits Matter (and What to Watch Out For)

Now that we understand the privacy risks posed by the 5, 9, and 14 Eyes alliances individually and cumulatively, let’s clarify a big question many of you have asked:

If a VPN is based in one of these alliances but has an independently audited no-logs policy, can you trust it? And is the flip side true - are VPNs outside these alliances automatically safer if they don’t have audits?

What Does “No-Logs” Actually Mean?

No-logs VPN provider doesn’t store any data that links your online activity back to you. This includes IP addresses, browsing history, connection timestamps, and more. When a VPN says it has a no-logs policy, it’s a big deal, but it’s easy to claim and hard to prove without external checks.

The Role of Independent Audits

The best VPNs go beyond words and invite reputable third-party security firms to audit their no-log claims. These audits involve inspectors reviewing server setups, software, and operational practices to confirm no user data is retained or available for government insiders. Regular audits from companies like PwC, Deloitte, or Cure53 add real credibility to a VPN’s privacy promises.

No-Logs in 5/9/14 Eyes: Does Jurisdiction Override Audits?

It doesn’t have to. If a VPN:

then being in an Eyes country doesn’t automatically mean your privacy is compromised. These audits essentially act as a watchdog against unlawful data handing.

What About Non-Eyes VPNs Without Audits?

Being outside an Eyes jurisdiction sounds safer, right? Sometimes, but not always. Many VPNs outside these alliances skip audits and quietly log connection data, sell usage stats, or share data behind the scenes. No audits mean no proof, which is a risk by itself. Our sheet highlights these details so you’re not left guessing.

​Bottom Line

This understanding is crucial for making smart decisions and shouting louder than marketing hype.

Why Should You Prioritize a VPN That's Not Based in the 14 Eyes Countries?

When it comes to protecting your online privacy, where your VPN is based matters a lot, sometimes more than the cool features a VPN offers. The 14 Eyes alliance is a group of countries with an intelligence-sharing pact that makes them quite powerful when it comes to surveillance. If your VPN provider is headquartered in one of these countries, they can be legally compelled to keep logs and hand over your data to governments. This isn't just theory; history has shown how these agencies monitor and share massive amounts of digital data, which can include what you do online through your VPN.

Even if a VPN promises a strict no-logs policy, the legal frameworks in 14 Eyes countries make it easier for governments to push VPN companies to collect or share data, sometimes under gag orders, meaning you wouldn’t even know it’s happening. Furthermore, these countries can work around each other’s privacy laws, creating a network of surveillance that’s tough to bypass. On the flip side, VPNs based outside the 14 Eyes jurisdictions aren’t entirely safe but generally have stronger legal protections, making it harder for your information to be compromised.

Ultimately, choosing a VPN located outside the 14 Eyes area means placing an extra layer of distance between your online activity and potential government overreach, boosting the chances that your privacy remains intact even under pressure.

Are There Any Reliable Free VPNs Outside 14-Eyes Countries?

Even choosing a trustworthy paid VPN is hard. Free VPNs make this worse because they have no revenue to fund servers, audits, or proper security. Many rely on ads and third-party trackers, which can collect or store your data, defeating the purpose of using a VPN.

Free VPNs are often unreliable because they:

Even if a free VPN is based outside the 14-Eyes countries, the business model itself usually depends on user data, making jurisdiction irrelevant.

Let's understand this with an example of Proton VPN.

Therefore, instead of choosing a free option, it's much wiser to get a free VPN trial instead, which gets you premium features for a limited time. For example, try NordVPN for free if you have an Android device through the VPN's 7-day trial.

How We Built the Ultimate VPN Privacy Database

This section explains how we researched, verified, and organized the data behind our VPN transparency sheet. It also shows you how to read the rankings and use the sheet to compare VPN providers with confidence.

Why and How We Built This Sheet (And Why You Can Trust It)

We made this sheet to help you easily compare privacy and security info for more than 40 VPNs. Instead of hunting through complicated websites or ads, you get all the important facts lined up in clear columns. Each column tells you something important about the VPN, so you can quickly see if it’s safe or risky.

Here’s what some of the key columns mean:

VPN transparency tracker: A comparative sheet detailing jurisdiction, ownership, and no-logs audit status of VPNs within 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
VPN transparency tracker: A comparative sheet detailing jurisdiction, ownership, and no-logs audit status of VPNs within 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.

We put all this info together by carefully checking official documents, audit reports, and VPN websites. So when you look at this sheet, you’re seeing real, verifiable facts that help you decide which VPN you can trust.

Oh, and one more thing about the sheet, you’ll see different colors in the columns. Those colors aren’t just decoration; they actually mean something important, but the meaning changes depending on which column you’re looking at. Let's understand it:

Column Name Green Meaning Red Meaning
Member of 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance The VPN’s country is NOT part of these spying alliances (marked as “No”) - this is safer. The VPN’s country is part of these alliances (marked as “Yes”) - more risky.
Independent No-Logs Audit Report The VPN has been independently audited to prove it doesn’t keep logs (marked as “Yes”), with audit years and links included for proof. The VPN has no independent audit to back its no-logs claim (marked as “No”).
Confirmed Data Sharing? The VPN has never shared user data with authorities or others (marked as “No”) - good for privacy. The VPN has shared user data at some point (marked as “Yes”) - a clear privacy warning.

These colors act like a quick traffic light system so you can instantly see which VPNs are safer choices and which ones might put your privacy at risk. Green is good, red is bad, and this gives you confidence to quickly pick a VPN that fits your privacy needs.

The idea is simple: you shouldn’t have to dig through 44 privacy policies and marketing pages. This sheet does that grunt work and puts alliance status, ownership, audits, and real‑world logging in one place, so when this guide recommends or warns about a VPN, you can always go back to the sheet and check the receipts yourself.

How to Use Our VPN Sheet Like a Pro (A Clear, Step-by-Step Breakdown)

When you first open the sheet, it can feel like information overload - jurisdictions, audits, parent companies, logging matrices, founding years, and more. But once you know how to read it strategically, the entire sheet becomes extremely easy to navigate.

To help you understand the logic behind every column and how to interpret it, we’ve broken down the process using two deliberately chosen VPNs: NordVPN and PrivateVPN.

Why these two? Because they represent sharp opposites. By comparing extremes, you’ll instantly understand how the sheet highlights strengths and weaknesses, and how you can use the same approach for any VPN listed.

Let’s walk through the sheet column-by-column using these two VPNs as examples.

Comparison of VPN providers by founding year, jurisdiction, audit history, and data-sharing practices, highlighting NordVPN and PrivateVPN for privacy contrasts.
Comparison of VPN providers by founding year, jurisdiction, audit history, and data-sharing practices, highlighting NordVPN and PrivateVPN for privacy contrasts.

The Eligibility Check is the first filter applied to every VPN in our database. It determines whether a VPN meets our minimum privacy requirements before receiving a final score.

A VPN receives:

Pass - If it meets our core requirements, including:

  • Privacy-friendly jurisdiction evaluation
  • Independent no-logs audit verification
  • No confirmed data-sharing incidents

Fail - If it does not meet one or more of these baseline privacy requirements.

For example:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅ Pass ❌ Fail
Based outside intelligence-sharing alliances Based in a 14 Eyes country
Multiple independent audits No independent audits
No confirmed data-sharing incidents No audit-backed privacy verification

What this teaches you: The eligibility check prevents VPNs with major privacy weaknesses from competing directly with providers that have stronger verification.

Eligible VPNs receive a weighted score based on multiple privacy factors:

  • Independent audit strength
  • Incident-free privacy history
  • Ownership transparency
  • Transparency reporting

The score helps compare VPNs that already passed the minimum requirements.

For example:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅Score: 97/100 Not scored as it did not pass
✅Six independent audits -
✅Strong ownership transparency -

A higher score does not mean a VPN is perfect. It means the provider has stronger evidence supporting its privacy claims according to our scoring methodology.

The Why This Score column explains the reasoning behind every ranking.

Instead of showing only a number, this column highlights:

  • What the VPN does well
  • Where points were deducted
  • Which factors influenced the final ranking

For example:

NordVPN

  • Earned a high score because of multiple audits, privacy-friendly jurisdiction, and no confirmed data-sharing incidents.
  • Lost minor points because transparency reporting is not as extensive as some competitors.

ExpressVPN

  • Scored highly because of strong audits and RAM-only infrastructure.
  • Lost points because of Kape Technologies ownership and fewer audits compared with top-ranked providers.

What this teaches you: The score alone does not tell the whole story. The explanation column shows why two VPNs with similar features may receive different rankings.

The first thing the sheet reveals is where the VPN is legally headquartered. This matters because the country determines what laws apply, including:

  • data-retention requirements
  • intelligence-sharing participation
  • whether VPNs can be forced to log user data
  • whether gag orders can hide these demands
NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅Based in Panama, which is not part of the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances. ❌Based in Sweden, a strict member of the 14 Eyes alliance.
✅No mandatory data retention laws. ❌Subject to international intelligence-sharing agreements.
✅Very low risk of government pressure. ❌Can be legally asked to monitor or log data.


What this teaches you: NordVPN has an upper hand over here since it is based in a privacy-focused jurisdiction, unlike PrivateVPN, which is from a country that is a part of an alliance. Therefore, always check where your VPN is based before anything else, jurisdiction sets the tone for everything that follows.

The sheet lists the parent company because ownership affects:

  • transparency
  • corporate ethics
  • potential data monetization
  • overall accountability
NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅Owned by Nord Security, a well-known, privacy-focused company. ❌Owned by Miss Group, a digital-services conglomerate.
✅Clear leadership, clear business model, established trust. ❌Less transparency, not privacy-specialized.

NordVPN’s parent company is well-known, transparent, and privacy-focused, whereas PrivateVPN’s owner, Miss Group, lacks the same clarity and specialization. This shows why it’s crucial to know who actually runs the VPN. Ownership affects trust just as much as the product itself.

Audits are one of the most important parts of the sheet. This column shows:

  • whether a VPN has been audited
  • how many times
  • when
  • by which security firms
NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅5 independent no-logs audits (2018, 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024). ❌No independent audits at all.
✅Verified by PwC and Deloitte - top global auditing firms. ❌Less transparency, not privacy-specialized.
✅Confirms NordVPN does not store IP addresses, timestamps, or activity logs.

NordVPN offers multiple verified audits from top-tier firms, while PrivateVPN has none. This clearly shows that audits are your only real proof that a VPN’s “no-logs” claim is true. If a VPN has no audits, your privacy depends entirely on blind trust, something you should avoid.

In this part, we researched whether there has been a past episode where the VPN company might have shared the information/data logs with other companies. Let’s have a look:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅No incident of data sharing in the past ✅No incident of data sharing in the past

Both NordVPN and PrivateVPN have a clear chit here. Neither of them has ever reported any incidents related to the leak of data. This is an absolute good thing. 

Using the sheet properly means evaluating all factors at once, not in isolation.

  • NordVPN Summary

✔ Privacy-friendly jurisdiction
✔ Multiple strong audits
✔ Transparent, privacy-focused parent company
✔ Minimal logs in matrix
✔ No incident of data sharing in the past

👉 Result: A strong, well-verified VPN with low privacy risk.

  • PrivateVPN Summary

✘ Located in a 14 Eyes country
✘ No independent audits
✘ Parent company lacks privacy specialization
✘ Shows potential logs
✔ No incident of data sharing in the past

👉 Result: Higher privacy risks with weaker assurances.

Bottom Line: NordVPN excels across jurisdiction, audits, ownership, and logging transparency, while PrivateVPN repeatedly falls on the riskier side of each category. This makes it clear that no single factor determines VPN safety. You must look at all elements together to get the full privacy picture.

Final Thoughts

After comparing and analyzing 44 VPN providers side by side in our sheet, one pattern was impossible to ignore: no single feature can protect your privacy on its own. What actually matters is the full context behind a service, its jurisdiction, its independent audits, its parent company, its logging practices, and the technology stack that powers its apps.

A provider based in a privacy-unfriendly country but backed by airtight audits and RAM-only systems can still be safer than a VPN in a “privacy haven” with zero audits and vague promises.

This guide, and especially the data-backed sheet behind it, gives you the receipts. Every VPN first goes through our Eligibility Check, which filters out providers that fail essential privacy requirements, such as lacking an independent no-logs audit or having confirmed data-sharing incidents. VPNs that pass are then evaluated using our weighted 100-point scoring system, helping you understand why some providers consistently rank higher while others fall behind despite attractive marketing or features.

So use the sheet as your compass. Compare jurisdictions, audit histories, parent companies, and logging behaviors side by side. Make choices based on evidence, not hype. And remember:

At the end of the day, your privacy is worth defending, and choosing the right VPN is one of the most important steps you can take.

If you ask us, NordVPN comes out on top. Across the 44 services we evaluated, it is the highest-scoring provider to pass our Eligibility Check, pairing a privacy-friendly jurisdiction (Panama), extensive independent no-logs audits, RAM-only infrastructure, advanced security features, and no confirmed data-sharing incidents. There are other strong options on the sheet depending on your budget or specific needs, but based on our current methodology, NordVPN delivers the most complete overall privacy package.

Some Additional Guides for Your Reference:

FAQ

What VPN Is Outside of 14 Eyes?

Truly outside options from our comparison include NordVPN (Panama), ExpressVPN (British Virgin Islands), Proton VPN (Switzerland), CyberGhost (Romania), Hide.me (Malaysia), FastestVPN (Cayman Islands), IVPN (Gibraltar), and others with no 5/9/14 Eyes membership. Location is just one factor; also consider ownership, independent no-logs audits, and past data-sharing incidents for a complete privacy assessment.

Is It Important to Check The Parent Company? Why?

Yes. The parent company’s jurisdiction, business practices, and track record affect how trustworthy the VPN is. Transparency about ownership of VPNs helps users assess risks like data sharing, surveillance, or hidden affiliations.

What Happens When We Use a VPN Inside 5-Eyes

Using a VPN in a 5-Eyes country still encrypts your traffic and masks your IP, but privacy depends on whether the provider actually stores any useful data. The safest choice is a VPN with a verified no-logs policy backed by independent audits and clear transparency, because a government request can only produce what the provider has retained. In other words, if there is no browsing history, IP log, or connection metadata stored, there is little for police or intelligence agencies to obtain. NordVPN is one example of a service that says it keeps no user-identifying logs and has repeatedly had that claim independently reviewed.

That’s all we have prepared for this guide on Top VPNs Outside 5/9/14 Eyes: 44 Providers Compared. If you have additional questions, feel free to share them with us via the comments section below. Thanks for reading!


For a better user experience we recommend using a more modern browser. We support the latest version of the following browsers: For a better user experience we recommend using the latest version of the following browsers: