When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

5 Best VPNs Outside 5 Eyes, 9 Eyes, and 14 Eyes Countries in 2025

Last updated November 28, 2025
Written by:
Novak Bozovic
Novak Bozovic
Tech & VPN Content Specialist
Why You Can Trust TechNadu
13
Test Process
53
VPNs Reviewed
100%
Transparency

Our experts have reviewed 53 VPN providers, which were put through extensive rounds of testing. To learn more about that process, here’s how we review VPNs, where we explain our criteria and our policy of being fully transparent.

The 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance is a group of countries that openly share surveillance data with each other in the name of “national security,” which usually means bulk collection of people’s online activity. If a VPN is based in one of these countries, it can be pressured to log data or hand over whatever it has.

Just being “outside 14 Eyes” doesn’t automatically mean a VPN is safe, nor does being inside automatically make it unsafe; what truly matters is a combination of factors: the jurisdiction the VPN operates under, the ownership and transparency of the provider, whether the VPN’s no-logs claims have been independently audited, and any past incidents or confirmed data sharing that reveal the provider’s real-world privacy practices.

This comprehensive view is essential to judge a VPN’s trustworthiness beyond just its geographic or legal status. Independent audits and a clean privacy track record provide stronger confidence in a VPN’s ability to protect user data.

In this guide, you’ll see the best VPNs that sit outside the 14‑Eyes countries and also look good in our sheet, plus a few “honest exceptions” that are technically in 5/9/14 Eyes but backed by strong no‑logs evidence. You’ll also learn how to read the sheet so you can quickly check your current VPN, avoid the noisy marketing claims, and pick something that actually fits your threat model.

Why and How We Built This Sheet (And Why You Can Trust It)

We made this sheet to help you easily compare privacy and security info for more than 40 VPNs. Instead of hunting through complicated websites or ads, you get all the important facts lined up in clear columns. Each column tells you something important about the VPN, so you can quickly see if it’s safe or risky.

Here’s what some of the key columns mean:

VPN transparency tracker: A comparative sheet detailing jurisdiction, ownership, and no-logs audit status of VPNs within 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
VPN transparency tracker: A comparative sheet detailing jurisdiction, ownership, and no-logs audit status of VPNs within 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.

We put all this info together by carefully checking official documents, audit reports, and VPN websites. So when you look at this sheet, you’re seeing real, verifiable facts that help you decide which VPN you can trust.

Oh, and one more thing about the sheet, you’ll see different colors in the columns. Those colors aren’t just decoration; they actually mean something important, but the meaning changes depending on which column you’re looking at. Let's understand it:

Column Name Green Meaning Red Meaning
Member of 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance The VPN’s country is NOT part of these spying alliances (marked as “No”) - this is safer. The VPN’s country is part of these alliances (marked as “Yes”) - more risky.
Independent No-Logs Audit Report The VPN has been independently audited to prove it doesn’t keep logs (marked as “Yes”), with audit years and links included for proof. The VPN has no independent audit to back its no-logs claim (marked as “No”).
Confirmed Data Sharing? The VPN has never shared user data with authorities or others (marked as “No”) - good for privacy. The VPN has shared user data at some point (marked as “Yes”) - a clear privacy warning.

These colors act like a quick traffic light system so you can instantly see which VPNs are safer choices and which ones might put your privacy at risk. Green is good, red is bad, and this gives you confidence to quickly pick a VPN that fits your privacy needs.

The idea is simple: you shouldn’t have to dig through 44 privacy policies and marketing pages. This sheet does that grunt work and puts alliance status, ownership, audits, and real‑world logging in one place, so when this guide recommends or warns about a VPN, you can always go back to the sheet and check the receipts yourself.

Understanding the 5, 9, and 14 Eyes Alliances – What You Need to Know

The 5, 9, and 14 Eyes are closely related intelligence-sharing alliances. They started as secret partnerships during and after World War II and evolved over decades into powerful global surveillance networks. Each alliance groups a set of countries that legally agree to collect, share, and exchange signals intelligence (SIGINT) and communications data, often bypassing individual privacy protections by outsourcing surveillance to partner countries.

Here’s what makes each alliance unique, along with their privacy downfalls:

Alliance Member Countries What It Means Downfalls
5 Eyes United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand The core intelligence-sharing group, with wide-ranging, unrestricted access to signals intelligence, including bulk collection systems like ECHELON and PRISM. - Most powerful surveillance network globally
- Mass data collection including foreign and domestic surveillance
- VPNs based here can be forced to hand over user data
- Data or intelligence is shared freely between all five nations
9 Eyes 5 Eyes countries plus France, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway An extension of the 5 Eyes with four additional nations that contribute intelligence, but with limited access compared to the core five. - Additional surveillance reach into parts of Europe
- Participating countries share intelligence but with less direct access than 5 Eyes
- VPNs in these countries may still face legal demands to share user data
14 Eyes 9 Eyes countries plus Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden A broader collaboration adding five more countries with limited intelligence access but generally cooperating on counterterrorism and cybersecurity. - Further expansion of surveillance territory
- Collaboration expands potential data-sharing and retention obligations
- Legal frameworks and cooperation in the EU increase user privacy risks
- VPNs headquartered here face similar concerns as above alliances

Think of the 5, 9, and 14 Eyes not as completely separate entities, but as layers in a growing surveillance network. Each time more countries join (from 5 to 9 to 14), the scope of intelligence sharing and cooperation widens.

This means if your VPN is based in a 14 Eyes country, it’s potentially subject to all the surveillance laws and agreements in the 5 Eyes and 9 Eyes countries too, since these alliances regularly exchange data with each other. So, your data could be exposed in multiple jurisdictions, even if your VPN tries to promise privacy.

That’s why, in our VPN sheet, we not only mark alliance membership but also include details like independent no-logs audits and parent company ownership. These elements help you judge whether a VPN based in an Eyes country still offers strong privacy protections, or whether you should look elsewhere.

Bottom line? The 5, 9, and 14 Eyes alliances form a growing global surveillance network. More countries mean more places where your online activity could be monitored or data collected. If your VPN is based in one of these countries, your privacy may be at risk despite promises. That’s why our sheet also checks independent no-logs audits and parent company ownership, so you can see which VPNs truly protect your privacy and which ones might not. This helps you make an informed choice instead of relying on marketing claims.

No-Logs VPNs in Eyes Countries: Why Audits Matter (and What to Watch Out For)

Now that we understand the privacy risks posed by the 5, 9, and 14 Eyes alliances individually and cumulatively, let’s clarify a big question many of you have asked:

If a VPN is based in one of these alliances but has an independently audited no-logs policy, can you trust it? And is the flip side true - are VPNs outside these alliances automatically safer if they don’t have audits?

What Does “No-Logs” Actually Mean?

No-logs VPN provider doesn’t store any data that links your online activity back to you. This includes IP addresses, browsing history, connection timestamps, and more. When a VPN says it has a no-logs policy, it’s a big deal, but it’s easy to claim and hard to prove without external checks.

The Role of Independent Audits

The best VPNs go beyond words and invite reputable third-party security firms to audit their no-log claims. These audits involve inspectors reviewing server setups, software, and operational practices to confirm no user data is retained or available for government insiders. Regular audits from companies like PwC, Deloitte, or Cure53 add real credibility to a VPN’s privacy promises.

No-Logs in 5/9/14 Eyes: Does Jurisdiction Override Audits?

It doesn’t have to. If a VPN:

then being in an Eyes country doesn’t automatically mean your privacy is compromised. These audits essentially act as a watchdog against unlawful data handing.

What About Non-Eyes VPNs Without Audits?

Being outside an Eyes jurisdiction sounds safer, right? Sometimes, but not always. Many VPNs outside these alliances skip audits and quietly log connection data, sell usage stats, or share data behind the scenes. No audits mean no proof, which is a risk by itself. Our sheet highlights these details so you’re not left guessing.

​Bottom Line

This understanding is crucial for making smart decisions and shouting louder than marketing hype.

How to Use Our VPN Sheet Like a Pro (A Clear, Step-by-Step Breakdown)

When you first open the sheet, it can feel like information overload - jurisdictions, audits, parent companies, logging matrices, founding years, and more. But once you know how to read it strategically, the entire sheet becomes extremely easy to navigate.

To help you understand the logic behind every column and how to interpret it, we’ve broken down the process using two deliberately chosen VPNs: NordVPN and PrivateVPN.

Why these two? Because they represent sharp opposites. By comparing extremes, you’ll instantly understand how the sheet highlights strengths and weaknesses, and how you can use the same approach for any VPN listed.

Let’s walk through the sheet column-by-column using these two VPNs as examples.

Comparison of VPN providers by founding year, jurisdiction, audit history, and data-sharing practices, highlighting NordVPN and PrivateVPN for privacy contrasts.
Comparison of VPN providers by founding year, jurisdiction, audit history, and data-sharing practices, highlighting NordVPN and PrivateVPN for privacy contrasts.

Step 1: Jurisdiction (Country of Incorporation & Member of 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance)

The first thing the sheet reveals is where the VPN is legally headquartered. This matters because the country determines what laws apply, including:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅Based in Panama, which is not part of the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances. ❌Based in Sweden, a strict member of the 14 Eyes alliance.
✅No mandatory data retention laws. ❌Subject to international intelligence-sharing agreements.
✅Very low risk of government pressure. ❌Can be legally asked to monitor or log data.


What this teaches you: NordVPN has an upper hand over here since it is based in a privacy-focused jurisdiction, unlike PrivateVPN, which is from a country that is a part of an alliance. Therefore, always check where your VPN is based before anything else, jurisdiction sets the tone for everything that follows.

Step 2: Check the Parent Company

The sheet lists the parent company because ownership affects:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅Owned by Nord Security, a well-known, privacy-focused company. ❌Owned by Miss Group, a digital-services conglomerate.
✅Clear leadership, clear business model, established trust. ❌Less transparency, not privacy-specialized.

NordVPN’s parent company is well-known, transparent, and privacy-focused, whereas PrivateVPN’s owner, Miss Group, lacks the same clarity and specialization. This shows why it’s crucial to know who actually runs the VPN. Ownership affects trust just as much as the product itself.

Step 3: Independent No-Logs Audit & Auditor

Audits are one of the most important parts of the sheet. This column shows:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅5 independent no-logs audits (2018, 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024). ❌No independent audits at all.
✅Verified by PwC and Deloitte - top global auditing firms. ❌Less transparency, not privacy-specialized.
✅Confirms NordVPN does not store IP addresses, timestamps, or activity logs.

NordVPN offers multiple verified audits from top-tier firms, while PrivateVPN has none. This clearly shows that audits are your only real proof that a VPN’s “no-logs” claim is true. If a VPN has no audits, your privacy depends entirely on blind trust, something you should avoid.

Step 4: Past incident of Sharing Data

In this part, we researched whether there has been a past episode where the VPN company might have shared the information/data logs with other companies. Let’s have a look:

NordVPN PrivateVPN
✅No incident of data sharing in the past ✅No incident of data sharing in the past

Both NordVPN and PrivateVPN have a clear chit here. Neither of them has ever reported any incidents related to the leak of data. This is an absolute good thing. 

Step 5: Put Everything Together

Using the sheet properly means evaluating all factors at once, not in isolation.

✔ Privacy-friendly jurisdiction
✔ Multiple strong audits
✔ Transparent, privacy-focused parent company
✔ Minimal logs in matrix
✔ No incident of data sharing in the past

👉 Result: A strong, well-verified VPN with low privacy risk.

✘ Located in a 14 Eyes country
✘ No independent audits
✘ Parent company lacks privacy specialization
✘ Shows potential logs
✔ No incident of data sharing in the past

👉 Result: Higher privacy risks with weaker assurances.

Bottom Line: NordVPN excels across jurisdiction, audits, ownership, and logging transparency, while PrivateVPN repeatedly falls on the riskier side of each category. This makes it clear that no single factor determines VPN safety. You must look at all elements together to get the full privacy picture.

Best VPNs Outside 14 Eyes Alliance - Based on Our Sheet

When people ask "what's the best VPN outside 14 eyes alliance," the answer is NordVPN, ProtonVPN, ExpressVPN, Surfshark, and CyberGhost, the strongest performers on our sheet by strict criteria like jurisdiction, audits, ownership, and no data-sharing incidents.

But before looking at the VPNs, it’s important to understand why these specific providers appear in this section. We didn’t choose them because they are popular, heavily marketed, or “top-rated” elsewhere. We selected them for one simple reason:

They are the strongest performers on our sheet when filtered through strict, measurable criteria, nothing more.

To avoid bias or guesswork, we applied the same filters across all VPNs in our jurisdiction sheet:

We are not recommending all of these VPNs blindly. This section shows which VPNs rank highly based on the raw data in the sheet, not personal opinions, affiliate bias, or marketing influence.

Some providers listed here (like PureVPN) have past controversies that we have openly mentioned in the sections below. We highly suggest you read the entire article before making a decision.

Let's have a look at the top 5 picks:

  1. NordVPN – Founded in 2012 and based in Panama (outside 14 Eyes) • Has 5 independent no-logs audits (2018, 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024) by PwC Switzerland and Deloitte Audit LithuaniaOwned by Nord Security (merged with Surfshark in 2022)No confirmed data sharing.
  2. ProtonVPN Founded in 2017 and based in Switzerland (outside 14 Eyes)Has 4 independent no-logs audits (2022, 2023, 2024, 2025) by SecuritumOwned by Proton AGNo confirmed data sharing.
  3. ExpressVPN Founded in 2009 and based in the British Virgin Islands (outside 14 Eyes)Has 3 independent no-logs audits (2019, 2022, 2025) by PwC and KPMG LLPOwned by Kape Technologies (acquired 2021)No confirmed data sharing.
  4. Surfshark Founded in 2018 and based in the Netherlands (9 Eyes jurisdiction)Has 2 independent no-logs audits (2023, 2025) by DeloitteOwned by Nord Security (merged 2022)No confirmed data sharing.
  5. Cyberghost Founded in 2011 and based in Romania (outside 14 Eyes)Has 2 independent no-logs audits (2022, 2024) by DeloitteOwned by Kape TechnologiesNo confirmed data sharing.
VPN Provider Year Founded Country of Incorporation Member of5/9/14 Eyes Alliance Parent Company Independent No-Logs Audit Report Auditor(s) ConfirmedData Sharing? Incident Proof
NordVPN 2012 Panama No Nord Security (merged with Surfshark 2022) Yes - 5 Audits (2018, 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024) PwC Switzerland; Deloitte Audit Lithuania No
Proton VPN 2017 Switzerland No Proton AG Yes - 4 Audits (2022, 2023, 2024, 2025) Securitum No
ExpressVPN 2009 British Virgin Islands No Kape Technologies (acquired 2021) Yes - 3 Audits (2019, 2022, 2025) PwC; KPMG LLP No
Surfshark VPN 2018 Netherlands Yes (9 Eyes) Nord Security (merged 2022) Yes - 2 Audits (2023, 2025) Deloitte No
CyberGhost VPN 2011 Romania No Kape Technologies Yes - 2 Audits (2022, 2024) Deloitte No
PIA (Private Internet Access) 2010 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Kape Technologies Yes - 2 Audits (2022, 2024) Deloitte Audit Romania No
Norton Secure VPN 2017 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Gen Digital (NortonLifeLock) Yes - 2 Audit (2024, 2025) VerSprite No
Bitdefender VPN 2017 (approx.) Romania No Bitdefender SRL Yes - 2 Audit (2023, 2025) Not publicly specified No
Hide.me 2012 Malaysia No eVenture Ltd. Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Leon Juranić (DefenseCode); Securitum No
Opera VPN 2022 Norway Yes (9 Eyes) Opera Software AS Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Deloitte No
Brave VPN 2020 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Brave Software, Inc. Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Assured AB (Swedish security firm) No
FastestVPN 2016 Cayman Islands No Fast Technology Ltd. Yes - 1 Audit (2023) Altius IT No
Mullvad VPN 2009 Sweden Yes (14 Eyes) Amagicom AB (Mullvad VPN AB) Yes - 1 Audit (2022) Assured AB (Swedish security firm) No
IVPN 2009 Gibraltar No IVPN Limited (Privatus Ltd.) Yes - 1 Audit (2019) Cure53 No
VyprVPN 2009 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Certida LLC Yes - 1 Audit (2018) Leviathan Security Group No
Ivacy VPN 2007 Singapore No PMG Pte. Ltd. No No
Whoer VPN (WhoX) 2022 Cyprus No WHOIX Ltd. No No
CactusVPN 2011 Moldova No CactusVPN Ltd. No No
Trust.Zone 2014 Seychelles No Trusted Solutions LLC No No
Avast SecureLine VPN 2014 Czech Republic No Gen Digital (formerly Avast) No No
Mysterium VPN 2017 Switzerland No Mysterium Network (Mysterium AG) No No
iTop VPN 2020 Hong Kong No iTop Inc. No No
PrivadoVPN 2019 Switzerland No Privado Networks AG No No
Kaspersky VPN 2017 Russia No Kaspersky Lab No No
Astrill VPN 2009 Liechtenstein No Astrill – privately owned, Liechtenstein-incorporated No No
TorGuard VPN 2012 United States No VPNetworks LLC No No
Perfect Privacy 2008 Switzerland No CyberDock IT Solutions GmbH No No
PrivateVPN 2009 Sweden Yes (14 Eyes) Miss Group (acquired 2022) No No
AirVPN 2010 Italy Yes (14 Eyes) AirVPN di Paolo Brini No No
Fast VPN (Namecheap) 2021 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Namecheap, Inc. No No
VPN Unlimited (KeepSolid) 2013 United States Yes (5 Eyes) KeepSolid Inc. No No
McAfee Safe Connect VPN 2017 United States Yes (5 Eyes) McAfee Corp. No No
StrongVPN 2005 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Ziff Davis (J2 Global – acquired 2019) No No
Mozilla VPN 2020 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Mozilla Corporation (Mozilla Foundation) No No
Windscribe VPN 2016 Canada Yes (5 Eyes) Windscribe Limited Yes - 1 Audit (2024) Packetlabs Ltd Partial 2021
PureVPN 2007 Hong Kong No GZ Systems Ltd. (PureSquare) Yes - 4 Audits (2019, 2020, 2021, 2023) Altius IT, KPMG Yes 2017
IPVanish 2012 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Ziff Davis (J2 Global – acquired 2019) Yes - 2 Audits (2022, 2025) Leviathan Security Group, Schellman Yes 2016
Hotspot Shield VPN 2008 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Aura (acquired via Pango in 2020) Yes - 1 Audit (2023) Aon (Cyber Solutions) Yes 2017
HideMyAss (HMA) 2005 United Kingdom Yes (5 Eyes) Gen Digital (formerly Avast/Norton) Yes - 1 Audit (2020) VerSprite (cybersecurity consulting) Yes 2011
Hola VPN 2012 Israel No Hola Networks Ltd. No Yes 2015
Urban VPN 2018 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Urban Cyber Security Inc. No Yes 2024
VPN Super Unlimited Proxy 2022 Singapore Yes (5 Eyes) Super Unlimited Inc. No Yes 2019
Touch VPN 2014 United States Yes (5 Eyes) Aura (acquired via AnchorFree/Pango) No Yes
Turbo VPN 2018 Singapore No Innovative Connecting Pte. Ltd. No Yes (suspected) 2023

1. NordVPN

Editor's Pick
Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chromebook
Kindle
Chrome
Firefox
PlayStation
Apple TV
Xbox
Amazon Fire TV
Nintendo Switch
All game consoles
Chromecast
Parallel Connections
Live Chat

NordVPN is pretty much a crowd favorite, and it’s no surprise why when you dig into its privacy pedigree, operating from Panama with five independent no-logs audits and RAM-only servers..

To explore its features, pricing, and more, visit our detailed NordVPN review page.

PROS

  • Based in Panama, outside 5/9/14 Eyes alliances.
  • Five independent no-logs audits confirming privacy.
  • Transparent, privacy-focused ownership by Nord Security.
  • Uses RAM-only servers to wipe data on reboot.

CONS

  • None.

2. ProtonVPN

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chromebook
Parallel Connections
Live Chat

ProtonVPN rolls from the privacy-loving country of Switzerland, widely respected for its strong privacy protections and a total “no friends” policy with the Five, Nine, and Fourteen Eyes alliances.

ProtonVPN’s legal foundation and audit track record make it a solid choice for privacy-conscious users. For more about its features and pricing, check out our in-depth Proton VPN review.

PROS

  • Switzerland-based, outside Eyes alliances with strong privacy laws.
  • Four independent audits affirming the no-logs policy.
  • Nonprofit ownership prioritizes privacy over profit.

CONS

  • Does not use RAM-Only servers

3. ExpressVPN

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chromebook
Kindle
Nook
Chrome
Firefox
PlayStation
Apple TV
Xbox
Amazon Fire TV
Nintendo Switch
All game consoles
All smart TVs
Chromecast
Roku
Parallel Connections
Live Chat

ExpressVPN is has long been a heavyweight in the VPN world, and a big reason for that is its blend of privacy and transparency.

Let's learn more about its capabilities and pricing in our comprehensive and in-depth review of ExpressVPN.

PROS

  • Based in privacy-friendly British Virgin Islands outside Eyes alliances.
  • Three independent audits confirm strict no-logs adherence.
  • Independent operations despite Kape ownership.
  • Uses RAM-only servers.

CONS

  • BVI autonomy may raise concerns for some due to UK ties.

4. Surfshark

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chrome
Firefox
Amazon Fire TV
All game consoles
All smart TVs
Parallel Connections
Live Chat

Surfshark is one of the “younger but serious” privacy players.

Despite its jurisdiction, Surfshark’s privacy practices and audit transparency make it a strong contender. Discover detailed information about its features and pricing in our comprehensive Surfshark review.

PROS

  • Owned by Nord Security with independent infrastructure.
  • Two Deloitte audits confirm no-logs compliance.
  • Uses RAM-only servers.
  • Supports unlimited simultaneous connections.

CONS

  • Based in Netherlands, a 9 Eyes country.

5. CyberGhost

Servers
Countries
Apps
Windows
Android
Mac
iOS
Linux
Router
Chrome
Firefox
PlayStation
Xbox
Amazon Fire TV
Nintendo Switch
Samsung Smart TV
All game consoles
All smart TVs
Roku
Parallel Connections
Live Chat

CyberGhost VPN is a budget-friendly, privacy-focused VPN that balances strong encryption and impressive server coverage with a user-friendly experience, making it a solid choice for many users in 2025.

For an extensive look at how CyberGhost performs and its pricing plans, visit our CyberGhost review page where we talk aout each and every aspect related to CyberGhost.

PROS

  • Romania-based outside Eyes alliances with GDPR protection.
  • Two Deloitte audits verify no-logs policy.
  • Uses RAM-only servers.

CONS

  • Romania’s EU jurisdiction has some surveillance cooperation.

VPNs That Have Shared Data With Governments

While many VPNs promise strong privacy protections, a few have confirmed instances of sharing user data with governments or law enforcement agencies. Some of these VPNs tick most boxes, but leave one or two. We have mentioned one such VPN that looks perfect, but only because of its cover:

PureVPN

Other VPNs Confirmed to Have Shared Data:

From all this data, one thing is clear - you should weigh such incidents heavily when choosing a VPN, as trust and privacy can be compromised even by providers claiming no-logs policies. It is best to rely on VPNs with transparent independent audits, strong no-logs enforcement, company backgrounds and jurisdictions with robust privacy laws. You cannot just look at one thing and forget the rest. The entire picture is very important.

Why Should You Prioritize a VPN That's Not Based in the 14 Eyes Countries?

When it comes to protecting your online privacy, where your VPN is based matters a lot, sometimes more than the cool features a VPN offers. The 14 Eyes alliance is a group of countries with an intelligence-sharing pact that makes them quite powerful when it comes to surveillance. If your VPN provider is headquartered in one of these countries, they can be legally compelled to keep logs and hand over your data to governments. This isn't just theory; history has shown how these agencies monitor and share massive amounts of digital data, which can include what you do online through your VPN.

Even if a VPN promises a strict no-logs policy, the legal frameworks in 14 Eyes countries make it easier for governments to push VPN companies to collect or share data, sometimes under gag orders, meaning you wouldn’t even know it’s happening. Furthermore, these countries can work around each other’s privacy laws, creating a network of surveillance that’s tough to bypass. On the flip side, VPNs based outside the 14 Eyes jurisdictions aren’t entirely safe but generally have stronger legal protections, making it harder for your information to be compromised.

Ultimately, choosing a VPN located outside the 14 Eyes area means placing an extra layer of distance between your online activity and potential government overreach, boosting the chances that your privacy remains intact even under pressure.

Are There Any Reliable Free VPNs Outside 14-Eyes Countries?

Even choosing a trustworthy paid VPN is hard. Free VPNs make this worse because they have no revenue to fund servers, audits, or proper security. Many rely on ads and third-party trackers, which can collect or store your data, defeating the purpose of using a VPN.

Free VPNs are often unreliable because they:

Even if a free VPN is based outside the 14-Eyes countries, the business model itself usually depends on user data, making jurisdiction irrelevant.

Let's understand this with an example of Proton VPN.

Therefore, instead of choosing a free option, it's much wiser to get a free VPN trial instead, which gets you premium features for a limited time. For example, try NordVPN for free if you have an Android device through the VPN's 7-day trial.

Final Thoughts

After comparing and analyzing 44 VPN providers side by side in our sheet, one pattern was impossible to ignore: no single feature can protect your privacy on its own. What actually matters is the full context behind a service, its jurisdiction, its independent audits, its parent company, its logging practices, and the technology stack that powers its apps.

A provider based in a privacy-unfriendly country but backed by airtight audits and RAM-only systems can still be safer than a VPN in a “privacy haven” with zero audits and vague promises.

This guide, and especially the data-backed sheet behind it, gives you the receipts. It helps you understand why some VPNs consistently appear in expert recommendations, and why others raise red flags no matter how attractive their pricing or marketing may look.

So use the sheet as your compass. Compare jurisdictions, audit histories, parent companies, and logging behaviors side by side. Make choices based on evidence, not hype. And remember:

At the end of the day, your privacy is worth defending, and choosing the right VPN is one of the most important steps you can take.

If you ask us, NordVPN comes out on top. Across the 44 services we evaluated, it is the only provider that paired a privacy‑friendly base (Panama), multiple independent no‑logs audits, RAM‑only infrastructure, advanced security features, and consistently top‑tier speeds without exposing any serious technical or policy‑level errors in our checks. There are other strong options on the sheet you can choose from depending on your budget or niche needs, but in this dataset, NordVPN is the only service that felt truly “complete” and effectively error‑free from a privacy, security, and performance standpoint.

Some Additional Guides for Your Reference:

FAQ

What VPN Is Outside of 14 Eyes?

Truly outside options from our comparison include NordVPN (Panama), ExpressVPN (British Virgin Islands), Proton VPN (Switzerland), CyberGhost (Romania), Hide.me (Malaysia), FastestVPN (Cayman Islands), IVPN (Gibraltar), and others with no 5/9/14 Eyes membership. Location is just one factor; also consider ownership, independent no-logs audits, and past data-sharing incidents for a complete privacy assessment.

Is It Important to Check The Parent Company? Why?

Yes. The parent company’s jurisdiction, business practices, and track record affect how trustworthy the VPN is. Transparency about ownership of VPNs helps users assess risks like data sharing, surveillance, or hidden affiliations.

What Happens When We Use a VPN Inside 5-Eyes

Using a VPN within a 5-Eyes country still encrypts your traffic and hides your IP, but local laws may allow government agencies to request data from VPN providers. That’s why choosing a provider with a strict no-logs policy is crucial.

That’s all we have prepared for this guide on Top VPNs Outside 5/9/14 Eyes: 44 Providers Compared. If you have additional questions, feel free to share them with us via the comments section below. Thanks for reading!


For a better user experience we recommend using a more modern browser. We support the latest version of the following browsers: For a better user experience we recommend using the latest version of the following browsers: