VPN Transparency in 2025: What Experts Say About Free Apps, Chrome Extensions & Trust

Published
Written by:
Rachita Jain
Rachita Jain
VPN Staff Editor

As VPN usage surges across gaming, streaming, and privacy-conscious browsing, the question of trust looms larger than ever. TechNadu reached out to leading VPN providers, including NordVPN, Windscribe, and IPVansih, for their insights on transparency, audits, and the growing risks posed by free VPNs and browser extensions. Their responses, combined with Citizen Lab’s findings and academic research, offer a clear framework for identifying VPNs that protect users rather than exploit them.

The Free VPN Trap: What Citizen Lab and Experts Reveal

Free VPNs dominate app stores, especially Google Play. But beneath the surface, most pose serious risks. As Windscribe’s co-founder Yegor Sak bluntly states:

The Play Store is flooded with free VPNs whose business model depends on monetizing user data, which directly contradicts the purpose of a VPN.

Free VPNs aren’t just under-resourced, they’re structurally incentivized to exploit user data for monetization. Robert Custons, Head of Product Marketing, and Crysta Timmerman, Cybersecurity & Martech from VIPRE, point out that maintaining a secure infrastructure is costly, and without a sustainable revenue model, many free apps resort to tracking, advertising, or weak encryption to stay afloat. This creates a privacy paradox: the very tool meant to protect users becomes a threat.

VPN infrastructure is expensive to maintain, and free apps often compensate by cutting corners on encryption and server security or by monetizing user data through tracking and advertising.

The numbers are staggering:

These statistics aren’t just alarming, they’re systemic. They reveal how deeply flawed the free VPN ecosystem is, especially on platforms with lax app review processes like Google Play. For users, this means that choosing a VPN based on popularity or price alone can lead to serious privacy compromises. NordVPN’s CTO Marijus Briedis urges users to focus on technical benchmarks:

First, verify that VPNs use encryption standards like AES-256 or ChaCha20 paired with modern protocols such as OpenVPN, WireGuard, or IKEv2, rather than obsolete ones like PPTP or L2TP without IPSec. Second, look for providers that uphold a verified no-logs policy and provide forward secrecy.

Robert Custons and Crysta Timmerman from IPVanish further echoes this with a checklist of what separates a trustworthy provider from a risky one:

Ultimately, a reputable VPN provider is transparent, accountable, and accessible. Anything less should set off alarms.

Chrome Extensions: The Silent Risk

Browser-based VPNs, especially Chrome extensions, introduce a layer of vulnerability that many users overlook. While desktop and mobile apps often undergo rigorous testing, extensions can slip through the cracks, offering convenience at the cost of control. Windscribe’s Yegor Sak highlights the core issue:

With browser extensions this becomes even more important, because you are often granting the extension developer far broader permissions than ordinary ads or trackers ever get. The best advice is simple: look for transparency. A legitimate VPN provider should explain how their extension works, what permissions it requires, and why. If you cannot find that information, or the extension is tied to an anonymous developer account with no clear company behind it, you are taking a real risk.

This means that a seemingly simple browser add-on could access browsing activity, manipulate network requests, or even inject scripts, without the user realizing the extent of its reach. The problem isn’t just technical; it’s structural. VIPRE Security Group, which owns IPVanish, expands on this concern:

Technically, many Chrome extensions act more like proxies than full VPNs, and their placement on the Chrome Web Store relies primarily on Google’s review, not a security audit. As a result, most VPN extensions, particularly free ones, have never undergone a formal, independent security review. Free VPN extensions often rely on data harvesting for revenue.

In other words, these tools may not offer the same encryption or tunneling protocols as full-fledged VPN apps. Instead, they function as lightweight intermediaries, often without the safeguards users expect. This lack of scrutiny opens the door to data harvesting, especially among free services whose business models rely on advertising networks.

NordVPN’s CTO Marijus Briedis reinforces the urgency of vetting these tools:

Unfortunately, many extension developers, especially those offering free services, don't invest in regular third-party security assessments. It is precisely why we see incidents like this happen.

From spyware-laced extensions to misleading privacy claims, the risks are real and growing. That’s why experts unanimously recommend sticking with browser extensions from premium providers that follow strict security protocols and transparent development practices.

The safest approach? Choose extensions that:

VIPRE's Robert Custons and Crysta Timmerman emphasize that a genuine VPN extension should come from an established provider with a verifiable track record, transparent release notes, and credible user reviews, not suspiciously inflated ratings or vague developer identities.

At the end of the day, Chrome extensions should be treated with the same scrutiny as any privacy tool. If it’s free, opaque, or anonymous, it’s not worth the risk.

Our Final Thoughts

From insights from Windscribe, NordVPN, and IPVanish, one thing is for sure: transparency isn’t optional, it’s foundational. Whether you're gaming, streaming, or browsing, your VPN should be backed by modern encryption, independent audits, and clear privacy policies. Free services may look appealing, but they often come at the cost of your data.

At TechNadu, we’ll continue spotlighting providers who earn your trust and not just your clicks.


For a better user experience we recommend using a more modern browser. We support the latest version of the following browsers: For a better user experience we recommend using the latest version of the following browsers: